#TOPAZ DENOISE AI VS LIGHTROOM MANUAL#
#TOPAZ DENOISE AI VS LIGHTROOM FULL#
#TOPAZ DENOISE AI VS LIGHTROOM SOFTWARE#
#TOPAZ DENOISE AI VS LIGHTROOM ISO#

This ensures that there is minimal loss of detail on the subject while rendering the background smooth and pleasing. I apply a pass of very strong NR on the background, and a lighter pass on the subject. I always apply NR selectively using layer masks. My NR Processīefore I show you the samples, I’ll briefly explain my NR workflow. For the purposes of this post, I’m only going to talk about High-ISO results Low-ISO results are more or less the same with any generic NR software. It does work and it performs better than I expected, but I have a few reservations. Well I’m glad you asked! The short answer is….it’s complicated. Sounds neat (pun totally intended), but does it work? What’s DeNoise AI?īasically, Topaz DeNoise applies NR using algorithms developed by “feeding it millions of noisy/clear images until it actually learned what noise is and how best to remove it.” (from Topaz Labs’ website).

#TOPAZ DENOISE AI VS LIGHTROOM SOFTWARE#

Over the past few months, though, I’ve seen and received a ton of ads about a new, shiny, AI-based, Rolls-Royce-esque software on the market – Topaz Labs’ DeNoise AI.

#TOPAZ DENOISE AI VS LIGHTROOM MANUAL#

At the moment, the only software that allows precise manual control over the selection of the sample, calibration, and level of noise reduction is Neat Image. This allows the software to distinguish between the pattern of noise and areas of detail. NR seeks to minimize the level of noise by analyzing a detail-less sample area within an image. Why is this important? Because that’s the basic premise of NR.

#TOPAZ DENOISE AI VS LIGHTROOM ISO#

As the ISO is increased, the SNR falls and the level of noise catches up with the level of detail. For example, at a camera’s native ISO (say ISO 100), the SNR is very high because the level of detail captured is significantly higher than the level of noise present. The ‘Signal-to-Noise ratio’ (SNR) is a good indicator of how much detail (Signal) is captured relative to the amount of noise in an image. Noise is an artifact caused by digital sensors and is present in all digital images, no matter how low an ISO is used. What is Noise?īefore we get to the meat of this post, it’s important to understand what noise is and how NR works. It’s not as easy as it sounds since proper NR involves careful manual adjustments based on the level of noise present in the image, not just dragging a slider all the way to the right (and no, that does not constitute manual labor lol). This was the situation for DJI Mavic Pros for a year or so until Adobe finally profiled the camera.Noise Reduction (NR, for short, since that term’s gonna come up a lot in this post) is an oft-misunderstood topic. LR uses the camera profile embedded in the DNG by the manufacturer. DNG raws from cameras not appearing in the LR/Camera Raw supported-camera list will show Profile: Color. *Footnote: There's one exception to this simple rule.

#TOPAZ DENOISE AI VS LIGHTROOM FULL#

Types I and II show the full set of raw camera profiles and raw lens profiles, while type III shows Profile: Color and non-raw lens profiles only. Type I shows Mosaic Data: Yes in the Metadata > DNG panel, while types II and III show Mosaic Data: No. These result from applying Library > Convert Photo To DNG to non-raws (TIFFs, JPEGs, etc.). These are still 'raw' in the sense that you can apply the full sets of raw camera profiles (e.g. These result from doing Photo > Photo Merge. Raw images that have been demosaiced into a linear raw representation. These result from applying Library > Convert Photo To DNG to a proprietary raw file. Raw images with un-demosaiced color filter array sensor data. There appear to be three different kinds of DNGs from LR's perspective, and they are hard to tell apart (and they don't have formally blessed names from Adobe, as far as I have found so far): I was always vaguely confused about the flavors of DNGs, so I poked around. Quick answer: If Develop's Profile shows Adobe Color, it contains raw data if it shows Color, it contains TIFF-like RGB data. What am I looking at here? Does the dng contain the raw data, or as I suspect am I working with 'tiff' like data?' 'I can then do further editing in Lightroom, however the regular develop profiles are not available to utilize.

Topaz denoise ai vs lightroom